🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.